Minasny, Budiman and Berglund, Ãrjan and Connolly, John and Hedley, Carolyn and de Vries, Folkert and Gimona, Alessandro and Kempen, Bas and Kidd, Darren and Lilja, Harry and Malone, Brendan and McBratney, Alex and Roudier, Pierre and O'Rourke, Sharon and Rudiyanto, Rudiyanto and Padarian, José and Poggio, Laura and ten Caten, Alexandre and Thompson, Daniel and Tuve, Clint and Widyatmanti, Wirastuti (2019) Digital mapping of peatlands A critical review. Earth-Science Reviews, 196. ISSN 00128252
Wirastuti-GE.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (9MB) | Request a copy
Abstract
Peatlands offer a series of ecosystem services including carbon storage, biomass production, and climate regulation. Climate change and rapid land use change are degrading peatlands, liberating their stored carbon (C) into the atmosphere. To conserve peatlands and help in realising the Paris Agreement, we need to understand their extent, status, and C stocks. However, current peatland knowledge is vague estimates of global peatland extent ranges from 1 to 4.6 million km<sup>2</sup>, and C stock estimates vary between 113 and 612 Pg (or billion tonne C). This uncertainty mostly stems from the coarse spatial scale of global soil maps. In addition, most global peatland estimates are based on rough country inventories and reports that use outdated data. This review shows that digital mapping using field observations combined with remotely-sensed images and statistical models is an avenue to more accurately map peatlands and decrease this knowledge gap. We describe peat mapping experiences from 12 countries or regions and review 90 recent studies on peatland mapping. We found that interest in mapping peat information derived from satellite imageries and other digital mapping technologies is growing. Many studies have delineated peat extent using land cover from remote sensing, ecology, and environmental field studies, but rarely perform validation, and calculating the uncertainty of prediction is rare. This paper then reviews various proximal and remote sensing techniques that can be used to map peatlands. These include geophysical measurements (electromagnetic induction, resistivity measurement, and gamma radiometrics), radar sensing (SRTM, SAR), and optical images (Visible and Infrared). Peatland is better mapped when using more than one covariate, such as optical and radar products using nonlinear machine learning algorithms. The proliferation of satellite data available in an open-access format, availability of machine learning algorithms in an open-source computing environment, and high-performance computing facilities could enhance the way peatlands are mapped. Digital soil mapping allows us to map peat in a cost-effective, objective, and accurate manner. Securing peatlands for the future, and abating their contribution to atmospheric C levels, means digitally mapping them now. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Cited by: 187 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | algorithm; digital mapping; image analysis; land cover; numerical model; peatland; remote sensing; satellite data; satellite imagery |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GA Mathematical geography. Cartography |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Geography > Departemen Sains Informasi Geografi |
| Depositing User: | Sri JUNANDI |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2026 01:02 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2026 01:02 |
| URI: | https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/27038 |
