Di Donato, Anne and Velásquez, Carlos and Larkin, Caroline and Shahaf, Dana Baron and Bernal, Eduardo Hernandez and Shafiq, Faraz and Kalipinde, Francis and Mwiga, Fredson F and Jose, Geraldine Raphaela B and Ganginenii, Kishore K Naidu and Nijs, Kristof and Moipolai, Lapale and Venkatraghavan, Lashmi and Lukoko, Lilian and Pandia, Mihir Prakash and Jian, Minyu and Masohood, Naeema S and Juul, Niels and Avitsian, Rafi and Manohara, Nitin and Srinivasaiah, Rajesha and Takala, Riikka and Lamsal, Ritesh and Al Khunein, Saleh A and Sudadi, Sudadi and Cerny, Vladimir and Chowdhury, Tumul (2025) Enhanced Recovery after Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 35 (3). pp. 255-264. ISSN 8984921
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries. © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ERAS for craniotomy; ERAS global perspective; enhanced recovery in craniotomy; hospital cost reduction; hospital length of stay. |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RD Surgical Divisions |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Surgical Divisions |
| Depositing User: | Mukhotib Mukhotib |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2026 04:09 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Nov 2026 01:05 |
| URI: | https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/30904 |
