Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Yunitri, Ninik and Chu, Hsin and Kang, Xiao Linda and Wiratama, Bayu Satria and Lee, Tso-Ying and Chang, Li-Fang and Liu, Doresses and Kustanti, Christina Yeni and Chiang, Kai-Jo and Chen, Ruey and Tseng, Philip and Chou, Kuei-Ru (2023) Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 53 (13). 6376 -6388. ISSN 00332917

[thumbnail of Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder.pdf] Text
Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (388kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background Evidence on the long-term comparative effectiveness of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) psychotherapies in adults remains unknown. Therefore, we performed an extensive network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies for people diagnosed with PTSD. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in Cochrane library, Embase, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and Psych-Info until March 2021. Studies on the effectiveness of cognitive processing therapy (CPT), cognitive therapy (CT), eye movement desensitisation reprocessing (EMDR), narrative exposure therapy (NET), prolonged exposure (PE), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), present-centred therapy (PCT), brief eclectic psychotherapies (BEP), psychodynamic therapy (PDT) or combination therapies compared to no treatment (NT) or treatment as usual (TAU) in adults with PTSD were included. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches were used for analysis in R-software. Results We included 98 RCTs with 5567 participants from 18 897 studies. CPT, EMDR, CT, NET, PE, CBT, and PCT were significant to reduce PTSD symptoms (SMD range: -1.53 to -0.75; Certainty: very low to high) at immediate post-treatment and ranked accordingly. Longitudinal analysis found EMDR (1.02) and CPT (0.85) as the significant therapies with large effect size in short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. NET and CPT showed higher proportion of loss of PTSD diagnosis (RR range: 5.51-3.45) while there were no significant psychotherapies for retention rate compared to NT. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence for improving current guidelines and informing clinical decision-making for PTSD management. However, the best PTSD treatment plan should be tailored to patients' needs, characteristics, and clinician expertise. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020162143 Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited by: 11
Uncontrolled Keywords: Adult; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Humans; Implosive Therapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Psychotherapy; Psychotherapy, Brief; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; adult; cognitive behavioral therapy; human; implosive therapy; meta analysis; network meta-analysis; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychology; psychotherapy; randomized controlled trial (topic); short term psychotherapy
Subjects: R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Public Health
Depositing User: Ani PURWANDARI
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2024 02:57
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2024 02:57
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/1112

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item