Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of smartphone-based virtual reality relaxation in chemotherapy patients: A pilot study

Gautama, Made Satya Nugraha and Haryani, Haryani and Huang, Tsai Wei and Pertiwi, Ariani Arista Putri and Sholihatun, Devi Rohmah and Noviana, Uki (2024) Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of smartphone-based virtual reality relaxation in chemotherapy patients: A pilot study. Nursing Practice Today, 11 (2). pp. 158-171. ISSN 23831154

[thumbnail of 283_Made Satya Nugraha Gautama.pdf] Text
283_Made Satya Nugraha Gautama.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (12MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background & Aim: While virtual reality holds promise for enhancing patient management and experience during chemotherapy, its use remains limited. The present study aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of smartphone-based virtual reality relaxation (SVR) in chemotherapy patients. Methods & Materials: In this pilot study, 29 participants were divided into two groups. The SVR group (n=14) experienced a 10-minute virtual reality intervention, while the control group (n=15) received standard care and guided imagery leaflets. Outcomes such as comfort, anxiety, pain, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse rate were evaluated at baseline and post-chemotherapy. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire and open-ended questions evaluated SVR’s acceptability. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric t-tests, and thematic analysis. Results: The SVR intervention appears feasible, as evidenced by a high recruitment rate of 93.75 (30 out of 32 eligible patients) and a retention rate of 96.67 (29 out of 30 participants), despite one withdrawal. The SVR group showed significant comfort improvement (P=0.002), significant changes in pulse rate (P=0.047), and SBP (P=0.023) compared to the control group. Anxiety, pain, pulse rate, and DBP showed no significant differences. A significant TAM variable (P<0.001) confirmed the intervention's acceptability. Qualitative feedback showed no serious side effects and patients reported positive experiences. Conclusion: The SVR intervention, feasible and acceptable, significantly improved comfort and altered pulse rate and SBP in chemotherapy patients. It shows potential as an oncology care strategy. Further validation is needed through large-scale trials. © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited by: 2; All Open Access, Gold Open Access
Uncontrolled Keywords: smartphone; virtual reality; cancer; chemotherapy
Subjects: R Medicine > RD Surgical Divisions
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Surgical Divisions
Depositing User: Ngesti Gandini
Date Deposited: 17 Jun 2025 08:35
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2025 08:35
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/18927

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item