Wiraswati, Hesti Lina and Bashari, M. Hasan and Alfarafisa, Nayla Majeda and Ma'ruf, Ilma Fauziah and Sholikhah, Eti Nurwening and Wahyuningsih, Tutik Dwi and Satriyo, Pamungkas Bagus and Mustofa, Mustofa and Satria, Denny and Damayanti, Ema (2023) Virtual screening of anticancer activity of chalcones and pyrazolines as potential EGFR, VEGFR, and cytochrome P450 inhibitors. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacognosy Research, 11 (4). pp. 699-713. ISSN 07194250
497_Hesti Lina Wiraswati.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Abstract
Context: Metastatic breast cancer is still categorized as an incurable disease because all available therapies are palliative treatments to relieve symptoms and increase life expectancy. Our previous study showed that N-pyrazoline-derived compounds have the potential as an antiproliferative drug in cervical cancer cells line. Therefore, virtual screening is conducted in this study to predict the anticancer potential of several molecules (chalcone and pyrazoline derivatives) against breast cancer cells before in vitro testing. Aims: To screen potential anticancer compounds of chalcone and pyrazoline derivatives through in silico approach. Methods: In this study were carried out multiple virtual screening steps to predict drug-likeness, pharmacokinetic, toxicity, and interactions between drug candidates and receptors involved cell in proliferation (EGFR, PDB.id 7LGS), angiogenesis (VEGFR1, PDB.id 3HNG; VEGFR2, PDB.id 4AG8), and oxidative stress (cytochrome P450, PDB.id 3UA1). Results: Results revealed that pyrazolines A, A1, A2, B, C2, D, and M could potentially be anticancer agents since the molecules qualify Lipinski's rule, are predicted to have good pharmacokinetics, are indicated as harmless, and exhibit the best binding affinity based on molecular docking analysis. Conclusions: The EGFR appears to be the main pathway targeted by pyrazoline derivates. Meanwhile, the ligand will go through the VEGFR1, VEGFR2, or P450 pathways when it successfully overcomes the binding obstacle. In addition, pyrazolines A, A1, A2, B, C2, D, and M need to be synthesized and evaluated the in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. © 2023 Academic Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences from Antofagasta (ASOCIFA). All rights reserved.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Library Dosen |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | antineoplastic agent; chalcone a; chalcone a1; chalcone b; chalcone b1; chalcone c; chalcone d; chalcone derivative; cytochrome P450; epidermal growth factor receptor; erlotinib; fruquintinib; holoenzyme; ligand; pyrazoline a; pyrazoline a1; pyrazoline a2; pyrazoline b; pyrazoline c; pyrazoline c1; pyrazoline c2; pyrazoline d; pyrazoline derivative; pyrazoline m; sorafenib; tamoxifen; unclassified drug; vasculotropin receptor 1; vasculotropin receptor 2; antineoplastic activity; Article; binding affinity; cell proliferation; chemical structure; computer model; controlled study; molecular docking; molecule; mouse; nonhuman; oxidative stress; pharmacokinetic parameters; protein interaction; rat; research; screening; software; toxicity testing; validation study |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) R Medicine > RD Surgical Divisions |
Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Public Health and Nutrition |
Depositing User: | Ngesti Gandini |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jun 2024 02:15 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jun 2024 02:15 |
URI: | https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/2515 |