Utarini, Adi and Indriani, Citra and Ahmad, Riris A. and Tantowijoyo, Warsito and Arguni, Eggi and Ansari, M. Ridwan and Supriyati, Endah and Wardana, D. Satria and Meitika, Yeti and Ernesia, Inggrid and Nurhayati, Indah and Prabowo, Equatori and Andari, Bekti and Green, Benjamin R. and Hodgson, Lauren and Cutcher, Zoe and Rancès, Edwige and Ryan, Peter A. and O’Neill, Scott L. and Dufault, Suzanne M. and Tanamas, Stephanie K. and Jewell, Nicholas P. and Anders, Katherine L. and Simmons, Cameron P. (2021) Efficacy of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments for the control of dengue. New England Journal of Medicine, 384 (23). 2177 – 2186. ISSN 00284793
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
BACKGROUND Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with the wMel strain of Wolbachia pipientis are less susceptible than wild-type A. aegypti to dengue virus infection. METHODS We conducted a cluster-randomized trial involving releases of wMel-infected A. aegypti mosquitoes for the control of dengue in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. We randomly assigned 12 geographic clusters to receive deployments of wMel-infected A. aegypti (intervention clusters) and 12 clusters to receive no deployments (control clusters). All clusters practiced local mosquito-control measures as usual. A test-negative design was used to assess the efficacy of the intervention. Patients with acute undifferentiated fever who presented to local primary care clinics and were 3 to 45 years of age were recruited. Laboratory testing was used to identify participants who had virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and those who were test-negative controls. The primary end point was symptomatic VCD of any severity caused by any dengue virus serotype. RESULTS After successful introgression of wMel into the intervention clusters, 8144 participants were enrolled; 3721 lived in intervention clusters, and 4423 lived in control clusters. In the intention-to-treat analysis, VCD occurred in 67 of 2905 participants (2.3) in the intervention clusters and in 318 of 3401 (9.4) in the control clusters (aggregate odds ratio for VCD, 0.23; 95 confidence interval CI, 0.15 to 0.35; P = 0.004). The protective efficacy of the intervention was 77.1% (95% CI, 65.3 to 84.9) and was similar against the four dengue virus serotypes. The incidence of hospitalization for VCD was lower among participants who lived in intervention clusters (13 of 2905 participants 0.4%) than among those who lived in control clusters (102 of 3401 3.0%) (protective efficacy, 86.2%; 95% CI, 66.2 to 94.3). CONCLUSIONS Introgression of wMel into A. aegypti populations was effective in reducing the incidence of symptomatic dengue and resulted in fewer hospitalizations for dengue among the participants. Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Cited by: 271; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Adolescent; Adult; Aedes; Animals; Child; Child, Preschool; Communicable Disease Control; Dengue; Dengue Virus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Indonesia; Male; Middle Aged; Mosquito Vectors; Wolbachia; Young Adult; adult; article; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; Dengue virus; drug efficacy; female; hospitalization; human; incidence; Indonesia; introgression; laboratory test; major clinical study; male; middle aged; mosquito control; nonhuman; primary medical care; randomized controlled trial; serotype; Wolbachia; adolescent; Aedes; animal; child; communicable disease control; dengue; Dengue virus; isolation and purification; microbiology; mosquito vector; preschool child; procedures; virology; young adult |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RP Public Health and Nutrition |
Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Public Health and Nutrition |
Depositing User: | Sri JUNANDI |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2024 02:16 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2024 02:16 |
URI: | https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/4579 |