Health financing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for universal health care: a case study of 15 countries

De Foo, C. and Verma, M. and Tan, S.Y. and Hamer, J. and van der Mark, N. and Pholpark, A. and Hanvoravongchai, P. and Cheh, P.L.J. and Marthias, T. and Mahendradhata, Y. and Putri, L.P. and Hafidz, F. and Giang, K.B. and Khuc, T.H.H. and Van Minh, H. and Wu, S. and Caamal-Olvera, C.G. and Orive, G. and Wang, H. and Nachuk, S. and Lim, J. and de Oliveira Cruz, V. and Yates, R. and Legido-Quigley, H. (2023) Health financing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for universal health care: a case study of 15 countries. The Lancet Global Health, 11 (12). e1964-e1977. ISSN 2214109X

[thumbnail of Health financing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for universal health care.pdf] Text
Health financing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for universal health care.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (408kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was a health emergency requiring rapid fiscal resource mobilisation to support national responses. The use of effective health financing mechanisms and policies, or lack thereof, affected the impact of the pandemic on the population, particularly vulnerable groups and individuals. We provide an overview and illustrative examples of health financing policies adopted in 15 countries during the pandemic, develop a framework for resilient health financing, and use this pandemic to argue a case to move towards universal health coverage (UHC). Methods: In this case study, we examined the national health financing policy responses of 15 countries, which were purposefully selected countries to represent all WHO regions and have a range of income levels, UHC index scores, and health system typologies. We did a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, technical reports, and publicly available data on policy measures undertaken in response to the pandemic and complemented the data obtained with 61 in-depth interviews with health systems and health financing experts. We did a thematic analysis of our data and organised key themes into a conceptual framework for resilient health financing. Findings: Resilient health financing for health emergencies is characterised by two main phases: (1) absorb and recover, where health systems are required to absorb the initial and subsequent shocks brought about by the pandemic and restabilise from them; and (2) sustain, where health systems need to expand and maintain fiscal space for health to move towards UHC while building on resilient health financing structures that can better prepare health systems for future health emergencies. We observed that five key financing policies were implemented across the countries�namely, use of extra-budgetary funds for a swift initial response, repurposing of existing funds, efficient fund disbursement mechanisms to ensure rapid channelisation to the intended personnel and general population, mobilisation of the private sector to mitigate the gaps in public settings, and expansion of service coverage to enhance the protection of vulnerable groups. Accountability and monitoring are needed at every stage to ensure efficient and accountable movement and use of funds, which can be achieved through strong governance and coordination, information technology, and community engagement. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that health systems need to leverage the COVID-19 pandemic as a window of opportunity to make health financing policies robust and need to politically commit to public financing mechanisms that work to prepare for future emergencies and as a lever for UHC. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: LibrarY Dosen
Uncontrolled Keywords: anxiety; Article; conceptual framework; coronavirus disease 2019; cost effectiveness analysis; digital technology; financial management; health care; health care cost; health care delivery; health care organization; health care policy; health insurance; health service; human; immunization; intensive care unit; interview; pandemic; population size; public finance; public health; social insurance; social support; teleconsultation; telemedicine; universal health care; vaccination; World Health Organization; coronavirus disease 2019; emergency; health care financing, COVID-19; Emergencies; Health Policy; Healthcare Financing; Humans; Pandemics; Universal Health Care
Subjects: R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Public Health
Depositing User: Ani PURWANDARI
Date Deposited: 26 Jun 2024 03:06
Last Modified: 26 Jun 2024 03:06
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/572

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item