How students and specialists appreciate the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) in Indonesian clerkships

Suhoyo, Yoyo and Schonrock-Adema, Johanna and Emilia, Ova and Kuks, Jan B. M. and Cohen-Schotanus, Janke (2020) How students and specialists appreciate the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) in Indonesian clerkships. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 20 (1).

[thumbnail of s12909-020-02062-z.pdf] Text
s12909-020-02062-z.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (548kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Cultural differences might challenge the acceptance of the implementation of assessment formats
that are developed in other countries. Acceptance of assessment formats is essential for its effectiveness; therefore,
we explored the views of students and specialists on the practicality and impact on learning of these formats. This
study was conducted to explore Indonesian students’ and specialists’ appreciation of the implementation of the
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in Indonesian clerkships.
Methods: This study was conducted at the Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. Participants were 52 students and
21 specialists in neurology and 78 students and 50 specialists in internal medicine. They were asked to complete a
19-item questionnaire that covered the characteristics of the mini-CEX such as its practicality, and the impact on
learning and professional development. We used a Mann-Whitney U test to analyse the data.
Results: In total, 124 students (46 from neurology and 78 from internal medicine) and 38 specialists (13 from
neurology and 25 from internal medicine) participated in this study.
Students and specialists were positive about the practicality of the mini-CEX and the impact of this assessment
format on learning and on professional development. The Mann-Whitney U test showed that there were no
significant differences between students’ and specialists’ opinions on the mini-CEX, except for 2 items: specialists’
appreciation of direct observation (mean rank = 93.16) was statistically significantly higher than students’
appreciation of it (mean rank = 77.93; z = 2.065; p < 0.05), but students’ appreciation of the item that students’ past
mini-CEX results affected their recent mini-CEX outcomes (mean rank = 85.29) was significantly higher than
specialists’ appreciation of it (mean rank = 69.12; z = 2140; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Students and specialists were positive about the mini-CEX in Indonesian clerkships, although it was
developed and validated in another culture. We found only small differences between their appreciations, which
could be explained by the patterns of specialist-student interaction in Indonesian culture as large power distance
and low individualism country.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Library Dosen
Uncontrolled Keywords: Mini-CEX; Acceptability; Cultural differences; Undergraduate clerkship
Subjects: R Medicine > RP Public Health and Nutrition
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing > Nursing
Depositing User: Sri JUNANDI
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2025 08:31
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2025 08:31
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/17989

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item