Anticipating a new conservation bureaucracy? Land and power in Indonesia's Essential Ecosystem Area policy

Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. and Fisher, Micah and Nasri, Nasri and Dharmiasih, Wiwik and Verheijen, Bart and Maryudi, Ahmad (2020) Anticipating a new conservation bureaucracy? Land and power in Indonesia's Essential Ecosystem Area policy. LAND USE POLICY, 97. ISSN 0264-8377

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0264837719324081-main.pdf] Text
1-s2.0-S0264837719324081-main.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

As an emerging policy in Indonesia, “Essential Ecosystem Areas” (EEA) is being established as an instrument to expand protections for conservation areas at sites beyond the classical domain of the conservation bureaucracy. The policy impetus is from recent global research identifying high conservation values located outside of formally designated conservation areas. EEA policy provides a foundation for justifying conservation practices at sites based on high biodiversity indicators, but which might not have previously held formal protections. This policy instrument is particularly unique in Indonesia because it is envisioned to support initiatives that emerge voluntarily, even in areas that might not have been historically thought of as conservation areas. This is unusual because it applies to all land categories, including private and public lands. In this article, we introduce the EEA policy and identify the potential applications it might have, considering the possibilities for future conservation area management in Indonesia. In particular, we identify some key principles for researchers and practitioners to follow when assessing EEA implementation. Our organizing framework consists of several elements based on existing land and power characteristics, which we connect to the institutions that might emerge amidst these new policy arrangements. We apply the land and power framework to two emerging EEA sites in Sulawesi to anticipate the extent to which the policy suggests a future trajectory for conservation management, or whether conservation policy will remain tied to existing rigid bureaucratic structures. Findings from the two cases point to the continued primacy of the centralized conservation bureaucracy, indicating that EEA sites are being negotiated through the classical approach for administering conservation areas.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Library Dosen
Uncontrolled Keywords: Essential conservation areas; Voluntary conservation; Conservation bureaucracy; multistakeholder; collaborative forum; Indonesia
Subjects: S Agriculture > SD Forestry
Divisions: Faculty of Forestry
Depositing User: Sri JUNANDI
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2025 09:13
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2025 09:13
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/18067

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item