Drought Hazard Modelling of Klaten Regency Central Java Using AHP and TOPSIS Method

Nugrahani, Meiga and Santosa, Purnama Budi (2021) Drought Hazard Modelling of Klaten Regency Central Java Using AHP and TOPSIS Method. In: Geomatics International Conference 2021 (GEOICON 2021).

[thumbnail of Nugrahani_2021_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._936_012043.pdf] Text
Nugrahani_2021_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._936_012043.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

According to information of areas at high risk of drought provided by Central Java disaster risk assessment in 2016 - 2020, Klaten Regency is in the top ten at high risk of drought in Central Java. Drought is an annual disaster in this region, which usually occurs during the dry season. The impact of the drought has caused some areas to experience a lack of clean water. For the purpose of disaster mitigation in anticipating and minimizing drought disasters losses, it is necessary to analyze the level of drought with a decision-making system by comparing two methods, namely the AHP with TOPSIS. Both methods are decision-making methods that are composed of various criteria to obtain an alternative sequence of choices. Both the AHP and TOPSIS methods produces weight values and a positive ideal solution value, respectively. These are used as input data in the mapping of drought vulnerability analysis with Geographical Information Systems (GIS). The results of the analysis are visualized with a map that shows the level of drought vulnerability. AHP and TOPSIS method decision making generates the order of the drought classes in predicting the distribution of areas experiencing drought. To validate the model, the authors compare the results of the analysis of drought vulnerability of the two methods with drought data from BPBD (Local Agency for Disaster Prevention) and DPUPR (Public Works and Public Housing Department). The results show that AHP provides better results than TOPSIS based on results validation with BPBD and DPUPR data. By comparing the two models with BPBD data, the results show that the percentage of AHP suitability is higher than TOPSIS at 47,619 and 19,048 respectively.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information: Library Dosen
Uncontrolled Keywords: Drought, AHP, TOPSIS, GIS, Disaster
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering > Geodetic Engineering Department
Depositing User: Sri JUNANDI
Date Deposited: 18 Sep 2024 06:14
Last Modified: 18 Sep 2024 06:14
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/4955

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item