Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and sputum microscopy compared to sputum culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis in seven hospitals in Indonesia

Karuniawati, Anis and Burhan, Erlina and Koendhori, Eko Budi and Sari, Desvita and Haryanto, Budi and Nuryastuti, Titik and Gayatri, A. A. A. Yuli and Bahrun, Uleng and Kusumawati, R. Lia and Sugiyono, Retna Indah and Susanto, Nugroho Harry and Diana, Aly and Kosasih, Herman and Naysilla, Adhella Menur and Lokida, Dewi and Neal, Aaron and Siddiqui, Sophia and Lau, Chuen-Yen and Karyana, Muhammad (2023) Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and sputum microscopy compared to sputum culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis in seven hospitals in Indonesia. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. ISSN 2296858X

[thumbnail of 321.pdf] Text
321.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (698kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern in Indonesia, where the incidence was 301 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2020 and the prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB is increasing. Diagnostic testing approaches vary across Indonesia due to resource limitations. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear is widely used, though Xpert MTB/RIF has been the preferred assay for detecting TB and rifampicin resistance since 2012 due to higher sensitivity and ability to rapidly identify rifampicin resistance. However, <1,000 Xpert instruments were available in Indonesia as of 2020 and the Xpert supply chain has suffered interruptions. Methods: We compared the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and AFB smear to facilitate optimization of TB case identification. We analyzed baseline data from a cohort study of adults with pulmonary TB conducted at seven hospitals across Indonesia. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of AFB smear and Xpert MTB/RIF using Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) culture as the gold standard, factors associated with assay results, and consistency of Xpert MTB/RIF with drug susceptibility test (DST) in detecting rifampicin resistance. Results: Sensitivity of AFB smear was significantly lower than Xpert MTB/RIF (86.2 vs. 97.4, p-value <0.001), but specificity was significantly better (86.7 vs. 73.3, p-value <0.001). Performance varied by hospital. Positivity rate for AFB smear and Mtb culture was higher in subjects with pulmonary cavities and in morning sputum samples. Consistency of Xpert MTB/RIF with DST was lower in those with rifampicin- sensitive TB by DST. Discussion: Additional evaluation using sputa from primary and secondary Indonesian health centers will increase the generalizability of the assessment of AFB smear and Xpert MTB/RIF performance, and better inform health policy. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT027 58236. Copyright © 2023 Karuniawati, Burhan, Koendhori, Sari, Haryanto, Nuryastuti, Gayatri, Bahrun, Kusumawati, Sugiyono, Susanto, Diana, Kosasih, Naysilla, Lokida, Neal, Siddiqui, Lau and Karyana.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cited by: 3; All Open Access, Gold Open Access, Green Open Access
Uncontrolled Keywords: amikacin; ethambutol; isoniazid; kanamycin; ofloxacin; rifampicin; streptomycin; acid fast bacterium; adult; antibiotic sensitivity; Article; bacterium culture; cohort analysis; controlled study; cross-sectional study; female; human; Indonesia; intermethod comparison; lung cavity; lung tuberculosis; major clinical study; male; middle aged; multicenter study; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; nonhuman; positivity rate; prospective study; rifampicin resistance; sensitivity and specificity; sputum culture; sputum cytodiagnosis; sputum smear
Subjects: R Medicine > RB Pathology
Depositing User: Mukhotib Mukhotib
Date Deposited: 16 May 2024 02:23
Last Modified: 16 May 2024 02:23
URI: https://ir.lib.ugm.ac.id/id/eprint/548

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item